tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post8949589678950894579..comments2024-03-23T05:47:19.154+08:00Comments on Putra Merdeka: Janji Dicapati..!!!Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger87125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-35357777667475900152016-07-20T20:11:01.811+08:002016-07-20T20:11:01.811+08:00JL 99 KT SELAYANG TU JH LOW PUNYA KER, BAGUS LA ...JL 99 KT SELAYANG TU JH LOW PUNYA KER, BAGUS LA JL99 TU BANTU KERAJAA BUAT RUMAH MURAH HARGA 299 RIBU ATAS KAH KAH....DULU RUMAH MURAH TU BUAT HARGA 45 RIBU JERR....BOLELA BELI....TAPI SKARANG NI ,,,NAMPAK MACAM NK HALAU JER.....PROJIBOJUBO KOMEN SKIT ,,,Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-61451136803796402802016-07-20T18:51:11.331+08:002016-07-20T18:51:11.331+08:00WSJ has a history of false reporting
July 6, 2015
...WSJ has a history of false reporting<br />July 6, 2015<br /><br />It’s startling that the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), in boldly claiming to have evidence linking Prime Minister Najib Razak to financial fraud, did not show any such evidence.<br />It said evidence of fund transfers direct to Najib’s account had been sent to both the Attorney-General and the Prime Minister himself, but it has not shown proof of bank transactions.<br />This raises the question of how reliable WSJ is when it comes to reports on foreign politics. Indeed, it has got into hot soup before for false reporting.<br /><br /><br />Singapore<br />In 2008, Singapore sued WSJ for publishing an article casting doubt on the integrity of Singapore’s judiciary. When WSJ was found to be in contempt of court and was proven wrong in its reporting, all it did was apologise to its Asian readers, and it did this online. There was never an apology in hard print.<br />The late Lee Kuan Yew clashed with WSJ on many occasions. He accused it of biased reporting and drastically reduced its circulation in Singapore.<br /><br /><br />Prophet Muhammad<br />WSJ got itself into a mess when, a few years ago, it reported on a controversial film about Prophet Muhammad. It alleged that the movie was made by an Israeli-American named Sam Bacile and was financed by more than 100 Jewish donors.<br />It takes guts to reveal a name. Everyone thought WSJ had substantial evidence to make such claims. But as investigations drew to a close, it was revealed that the report was completely wrong. There were no records of any person named Sam Bacile in the United States or Israel.<br />People wrote to WSJ demanding an explanation, but it did not respond. Eventually, in September 2012, WSJ issued a statement of correction.<br /><br /><br />Boston bombing<br />After the infamous Boston Marathon bombing, WSJ erroneously reported that the police had found five explosive devices, two of which had been deployed. Minutes later, federal authorities dismissed the report as inaccurate.<br /><br /><br />Tesla<br />Last year, WSJ again found itself ridiculed for false reporting when it claimed that electric car maker Tesla had suffered a plunge in sales for one of its models. The CEO of Tesla, Elon Musk, took to Twitter on October 28 to reveal sale volumes, saying WSJ was “incorrect” in its reporting.<br /><br /><br />Russians in the Ukraine<br />Early this year, in an article titled “The Russians are coming, again,” WSJ reported that Russian proxies shelled a city called Avdiyivka in the Ukraine during a ceasefire. It was later shown that the report was mere speculation and WSJ was accused of “journalistic malpractice”.<br /><br /><br />Over the years, WSJ has been accused of deceptive journalism from various organisations around the world. With its so-called “evidence” against Najib, the only way to settle the issue is through a legal suit. Let independent investigation teams do their work and let the truth be told.<br />WSJ’s allegations against the prime minister are serious and drastic measures need to be taken against the paper if the allegations are false. If they are proven to be true, then Najib has no choice but to resign.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-65589125389373936032016-07-20T18:50:07.043+08:002016-07-20T18:50:07.043+08:00WSJ has a history of false reporting
July 6, 2015
...WSJ has a history of false reporting<br />July 6, 2015<br /><br />It’s startling that the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), in boldly claiming to have evidence linking Prime Minister Najib Razak to financial fraud, did not show any such evidence.<br />It said evidence of fund transfers direct to Najib’s account had been sent to both the Attorney-General and the Prime Minister himself, but it has not shown proof of bank transactions.<br />This raises the question of how reliable WSJ is when it comes to reports on foreign politics. Indeed, it has got into hot soup before for false reporting.<br /><br /><br />Singapore<br />In 2008, Singapore sued WSJ for publishing an article casting doubt on the integrity of Singapore’s judiciary. When WSJ was found to be in contempt of court and was proven wrong in its reporting, all it did was apologise to its Asian readers, and it did this online. There was never an apology in hard print.<br />The late Lee Kuan Yew clashed with WSJ on many occasions. He accused it of biased reporting and drastically reduced its circulation in Singapore.<br /><br /><br />Prophet Muhammad<br />WSJ got itself into a mess when, a few years ago, it reported on a controversial film about Prophet Muhammad. It alleged that the movie was made by an Israeli-American named Sam Bacile and was financed by more than 100 Jewish donors.<br />It takes guts to reveal a name. Everyone thought WSJ had substantial evidence to make such claims. But as investigations drew to a close, it was revealed that the report was completely wrong. There were no records of any person named Sam Bacile in the United States or Israel.<br />People wrote to WSJ demanding an explanation, but it did not respond. Eventually, in September 2012, WSJ issued a statement of correction.<br /><br /><br />Boston bombing<br />After the infamous Boston Marathon bombing, WSJ erroneously reported that the police had found five explosive devices, two of which had been deployed. Minutes later, federal authorities dismissed the report as inaccurate.<br /><br /><br />Tesla<br />Last year, WSJ again found itself ridiculed for false reporting when it claimed that electric car maker Tesla had suffered a plunge in sales for one of its models. The CEO of Tesla, Elon Musk, took to Twitter on October 28 to reveal sale volumes, saying WSJ was “incorrect” in its reporting.<br /><br /><br />Russians in the Ukraine<br />Early this year, in an article titled “The Russians are coming, again,” WSJ reported that Russian proxies shelled a city called Avdiyivka in the Ukraine during a ceasefire. It was later shown that the report was mere speculation and WSJ was accused of “journalistic malpractice”.<br /><br /><br />Over the years, WSJ has been accused of deceptive journalism from various organisations around the world. With its so-called “evidence” against Najib, the only way to settle the issue is through a legal suit. Let independent investigation teams do their work and let the truth be told.<br />WSJ’s allegations against the prime minister are serious and drastic measures need to be taken against the paper if the allegations are false. If they are proven to be true, then Najib has no choice but to resign.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-35798397012572603732016-07-20T18:48:44.796+08:002016-07-20T18:48:44.796+08:00WSJ has a history of false reporting
July 6, 2015
...WSJ has a history of false reporting<br />July 6, 2015<br /><br />It’s startling that the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), in boldly claiming to have evidence linking Prime Minister Najib Razak to financial fraud, did not show any such evidence.<br />It said evidence of fund transfers direct to Najib’s account had been sent to both the Attorney-General and the Prime Minister himself, but it has not shown proof of bank transactions.<br />This raises the question of how reliable WSJ is when it comes to reports on foreign politics. Indeed, it has got into hot soup before for false reporting.<br /><br /><br />Singapore<br />In 2008, Singapore sued WSJ for publishing an article casting doubt on the integrity of Singapore’s judiciary. When WSJ was found to be in contempt of court and was proven wrong in its reporting, all it did was apologise to its Asian readers, and it did this online. There was never an apology in hard print.<br />The late Lee Kuan Yew clashed with WSJ on many occasions. He accused it of biased reporting and drastically reduced its circulation in Singapore.<br /><br /><br />Prophet Muhammad<br />WSJ got itself into a mess when, a few years ago, it reported on a controversial film about Prophet Muhammad. It alleged that the movie was made by an Israeli-American named Sam Bacile and was financed by more than 100 Jewish donors.<br />It takes guts to reveal a name. Everyone thought WSJ had substantial evidence to make such claims. But as investigations drew to a close, it was revealed that the report was completely wrong. There were no records of any person named Sam Bacile in the United States or Israel.<br />People wrote to WSJ demanding an explanation, but it did not respond. Eventually, in September 2012, WSJ issued a statement of correction.<br /><br /><br />Boston bombing<br />After the infamous Boston Marathon bombing, WSJ erroneously reported that the police had found five explosive devices, two of which had been deployed. Minutes later, federal authorities dismissed the report as inaccurate.<br /><br /><br />Tesla<br />Last year, WSJ again found itself ridiculed for false reporting when it claimed that electric car maker Tesla had suffered a plunge in sales for one of its models. The CEO of Tesla, Elon Musk, took to Twitter on October 28 to reveal sale volumes, saying WSJ was “incorrect” in its reporting.<br /><br /><br />Russians in the Ukraine<br />Early this year, in an article titled “The Russians are coming, again,” WSJ reported that Russian proxies shelled a city called Avdiyivka in the Ukraine during a ceasefire. It was later shown that the report was mere speculation and WSJ was accused of “journalistic malpractice”.<br /><br /><br />Over the years, WSJ has been accused of deceptive journalism from various organisations around the world. With its so-called “evidence” against Najib, the only way to settle the issue is through a legal suit. Let independent investigation teams do their work and let the truth be told.<br />WSJ’s allegations against the prime minister are serious and drastic measures need to be taken against the paper if the allegations are false. If they are proven to be true, then Najib has no choice but to resign.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-53284357795414175462016-07-20T18:46:02.952+08:002016-07-20T18:46:02.952+08:00WSJ has a history of false reporting
July 6, 2015
...WSJ has a history of false reporting<br />July 6, 2015<br /><br />It’s startling that the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), in boldly claiming to have evidence linking Prime Minister Najib Razak to financial fraud, did not show any such evidence.<br />It said evidence of fund transfers direct to Najib’s account had been sent to both the Attorney-General and the Prime Minister himself, but it has not shown proof of bank transactions.<br />This raises the question of how reliable WSJ is when it comes to reports on foreign politics. Indeed, it has got into hot soup before for false reporting.<br /><br /><br />Singapore<br />In 2008, Singapore sued WSJ for publishing an article casting doubt on the integrity of Singapore’s judiciary. When WSJ was found to be in contempt of court and was proven wrong in its reporting, all it did was apologise to its Asian readers, and it did this online. There was never an apology in hard print.<br />The late Lee Kuan Yew clashed with WSJ on many occasions. He accused it of biased reporting and drastically reduced its circulation in Singapore.<br /><br /><br />Prophet Muhammad<br />WSJ got itself into a mess when, a few years ago, it reported on a controversial film about Prophet Muhammad. It alleged that the movie was made by an Israeli-American named Sam Bacile and was financed by more than 100 Jewish donors.<br />It takes guts to reveal a name. Everyone thought WSJ had substantial evidence to make such claims. But as investigations drew to a close, it was revealed that the report was completely wrong. There were no records of any person named Sam Bacile in the United States or Israel.<br />People wrote to WSJ demanding an explanation, but it did not respond. Eventually, in September 2012, WSJ issued a statement of correction.<br /><br /><br />Boston bombing<br />After the infamous Boston Marathon bombing, WSJ erroneously reported that the police had found five explosive devices, two of which had been deployed. Minutes later, federal authorities dismissed the report as inaccurate.<br /><br /><br />Tesla<br />Last year, WSJ again found itself ridiculed for false reporting when it claimed that electric car maker Tesla had suffered a plunge in sales for one of its models. The CEO of Tesla, Elon Musk, took to Twitter on October 28 to reveal sale volumes, saying WSJ was “incorrect” in its reporting.<br /><br /><br />Russians in the Ukraine<br />Early this year, in an article titled “The Russians are coming, again,” WSJ reported that Russian proxies shelled a city called Avdiyivka in the Ukraine during a ceasefire. It was later shown that the report was mere speculation and WSJ was accused of “journalistic malpractice”.<br /><br /><br />Over the years, WSJ has been accused of deceptive journalism from various organisations around the world. With its so-called “evidence” against Najib, the only way to settle the issue is through a legal suit. Let independent investigation teams do their work and let the truth be told.<br />WSJ’s allegations against the prime minister are serious and drastic measures need to be taken against the paper if the allegations are false. If they are proven to be true, then Najib has no choice but to resign.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-65664669474203918302016-07-20T18:34:22.545+08:002016-07-20T18:34:22.545+08:00WSJ has a history of false reporting
July 6, 2015
...WSJ has a history of false reporting<br />July 6, 2015<br /><br />It’s startling that the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), in boldly claiming to have evidence linking Prime Minister Najib Razak to financial fraud, did not show any such evidence.<br />It said evidence of fund transfers direct to Najib’s account had been sent to both the Attorney-General and the Prime Minister himself, but it has not shown proof of bank transactions.<br />This raises the question of how reliable WSJ is when it comes to reports on foreign politics. Indeed, it has got into hot soup before for false reporting.<br /><br /><br />Singapore<br />In 2008, Singapore sued WSJ for publishing an article casting doubt on the integrity of Singapore’s judiciary. When WSJ was found to be in contempt of court and was proven wrong in its reporting, all it did was apologise to its Asian readers, and it did this online. There was never an apology in hard print.<br />The late Lee Kuan Yew clashed with WSJ on many occasions. He accused it of biased reporting and drastically reduced its circulation in Singapore.<br /><br /><br />Prophet Muhammad<br />WSJ got itself into a mess when, a few years ago, it reported on a controversial film about Prophet Muhammad. It alleged that the movie was made by an Israeli-American named Sam Bacile and was financed by more than 100 Jewish donors.<br />It takes guts to reveal a name. Everyone thought WSJ had substantial evidence to make such claims. But as investigations drew to a close, it was revealed that the report was completely wrong. There were no records of any person named Sam Bacile in the United States or Israel.<br />People wrote to WSJ demanding an explanation, but it did not respond. Eventually, in September 2012, WSJ issued a statement of correction.<br /><br /><br />Boston bombing<br />After the infamous Boston Marathon bombing, WSJ erroneously reported that the police had found five explosive devices, two of which had been deployed. Minutes later, federal authorities dismissed the report as inaccurate.<br /><br /><br />Tesla<br />Last year, WSJ again found itself ridiculed for false reporting when it claimed that electric car maker Tesla had suffered a plunge in sales for one of its models. The CEO of Tesla, Elon Musk, took to Twitter on October 28 to reveal sale volumes, saying WSJ was “incorrect” in its reporting.<br /><br /><br />Russians in the Ukraine<br />Early this year, in an article titled “The Russians are coming, again,” WSJ reported that Russian proxies shelled a city called Avdiyivka in the Ukraine during a ceasefire. It was later shown that the report was mere speculation and WSJ was accused of “journalistic malpractice”.<br /><br /><br />Over the years, WSJ has been accused of deceptive journalism from various organisations around the world. With its so-called “evidence” against Najib, the only way to settle the issue is through a legal suit. Let independent investigation teams do their work and let the truth be told.<br />WSJ’s allegations against the prime minister are serious and drastic measures need to be taken against the paper if the allegations are false. If they are proven to be true, then Najib has no choice but to resign.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-51699937584946281022016-07-20T18:20:31.901+08:002016-07-20T18:20:31.901+08:00Kalau pembangkang di Malaysia ni cerdik, dah lama ...Kalau pembangkang di Malaysia ni cerdik, dah lama BN tumbang. Tapi kannn... PEMBANGKANG DI MALAYSIA SEMUA BODOH KETURUNAN. <br />Kalau tak bodoh, takkanlah negeri perak dan kedah BN boleh ambil balik. <br /><br />PEMBANGKANG MALAYSIA MEMANG BODOH. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-66985523961676227292016-07-20T18:18:20.446+08:002016-07-20T18:18:20.446+08:00551 is dreaming that the statement is like that. D...551 is dreaming that the statement is like that. Dream on, Mista. Until u become delusional. <br /><br />"Falsely believed"? Not wrongly believed? Lulu lu sikola mana? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-82028029310489551812016-07-20T18:09:11.876+08:002016-07-20T18:09:11.876+08:00setuju sesangat dgn 544 PTG.
Najib buang Peguam N...setuju sesangat dgn 544 PTG.<br /><br />Najib buang Peguam Negara Gani Pattail yang giatkan siasatan. Dia lantik Afandi yang menais bontot nya dapat jawatan itu, buat apa saja dan tak buat apa saja yang sesuai bagi Najib.<br /><br />Jadi, kita harapkan dan doa lah supaya tindakan di 7 negara luar negara itu akan melingkupkan dia. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-57203913680046942812016-07-20T18:00:52.096+08:002016-07-20T18:00:52.096+08:00Bodoh lagi kamu 456 PTG.
Najib boleh hantar loya...Bodoh lagi kamu 456 PTG. <br /><br />Najib boleh hantar loyar nya saman dia di England. Sapa saja boleh saman civil suit di London. Sebab Claire mustatin di London. <br /><br />Dah lah kamu bodoh, nak nunjuk pandai pulak. Dua kali bodoh le kamu.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-62557635765440473742016-07-20T17:58:18.522+08:002016-07-20T17:58:18.522+08:00WSJ has a history of false reporting
July 6, 2015
...WSJ has a history of false reporting<br />July 6, 2015<br /><br />It’s startling that the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), in boldly claiming to have evidence linking Prime Minister Najib Razak to financial fraud, did not show any such evidence.<br />It said evidence of fund transfers direct to Najib’s account had been sent to both the Attorney-General and the Prime Minister himself, but it has not shown proof of bank transactions.<br />This raises the question of how reliable WSJ is when it comes to reports on foreign politics. Indeed, it has got into hot soup before for false reporting.<br /><br /><br />Singapore<br />In 2008, Singapore sued WSJ for publishing an article casting doubt on the integrity of Singapore’s judiciary. When WSJ was found to be in contempt of court and was proven wrong in its reporting, all it did was apologise to its Asian readers, and it did this online. There was never an apology in hard print.<br />The late Lee Kuan Yew clashed with WSJ on many occasions. He accused it of biased reporting and drastically reduced its circulation in Singapore.<br /><br /><br />Prophet Muhammad<br />WSJ got itself into a mess when, a few years ago, it reported on a controversial film about Prophet Muhammad. It alleged that the movie was made by an Israeli-American named Sam Bacile and was financed by more than 100 Jewish donors.<br />It takes guts to reveal a name. Everyone thought WSJ had substantial evidence to make such claims. But as investigations drew to a close, it was revealed that the report was completely wrong. There were no records of any person named Sam Bacile in the United States or Israel.<br />People wrote to WSJ demanding an explanation, but it did not respond. Eventually, in September 2012, WSJ issued a statement of correction.<br /><br /><br />Boston bombing<br />After the infamous Boston Marathon bombing, WSJ erroneously reported that the police had found five explosive devices, two of which had been deployed. Minutes later, federal authorities dismissed the report as inaccurate.<br /><br /><br />Tesla<br />Last year, WSJ again found itself ridiculed for false reporting when it claimed that electric car maker Tesla had suffered a plunge in sales for one of its models. The CEO of Tesla, Elon Musk, took to Twitter on October 28 to reveal sale volumes, saying WSJ was “incorrect” in its reporting.<br /><br /><br />Russians in the Ukraine<br />Early this year, in an article titled “The Russians are coming, again,” WSJ reported that Russian proxies shelled a city called Avdiyivka in the Ukraine during a ceasefire. It was later shown that the report was mere speculation and WSJ was accused of “journalistic malpractice”.<br /><br /><br />Over the years, WSJ has been accused of deceptive journalism from various organisations around the world. With its so-called “evidence” against Najib, the only way to settle the issue is through a legal suit. Let independent investigation teams do their work and let the truth be told.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-37559453132002041742016-07-20T17:55:19.938+08:002016-07-20T17:55:19.938+08:005:02 PTG budak kicik, asyik kik kik kik
5:02 PTG budak kicik, asyik kik kik kik<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-53372084075636681832016-07-20T17:53:15.090+08:002016-07-20T17:53:15.090+08:00504, ko tak nafikan korang bergelumang dgn tahi, y...504, ko tak nafikan korang bergelumang dgn tahi, ye? Bagus lah.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-75558222187058640002016-07-20T17:51:59.130+08:002016-07-20T17:51:59.130+08:00You got it wrong. The correct statement should be ...You got it wrong. The correct statement should be like this: it is so clear that it is the Malaysian oppositions who had falsely believed the said money came from that GLC.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-83064388225433323982016-07-20T17:44:05.653+08:002016-07-20T17:44:05.653+08:00USD 1 billiunnn.. Penguatkuasa US nk rampas & ...USD 1 billiunnn.. Penguatkuasa US nk rampas & bekukan.. Hasil duit dari 1mdb yg disalurkan pada Reza Aziz & Jho Low & khadem.. <br />Apa puak dedak @ hancing nak jawab?<br /><br />Tak habis2 minta bukti.. Adakah minda sudah tidak berfungsi kerana terlampau memakan desak & bermandikan alasan2 kencing org atasan.<br /><br />Mari tunggu alasan diorg pulak.. Pelik dkt Malaysia mcm takda apa2 usaha nk siasat.tapi diluar negara dah berapa ramai diluar yg kena pecat & kena dakwa.<br /><br />Luar negara meletup2 isu siasatan pasal salah guna urusan Wang dari 1mdb.<br /><br />Dlm Malaysia mcm takde apa2. <br />Berbillion hilang tak nak cari ka ?<br /><br />Cuba duit sendiri tercicir atau wallet hilang sanggup cari balik & buat report polis wlaupun isi cuma rm50 ja..<br /><br />Duit tabung Masjid hilang kecoh satu Malaysia. <br /><br />Duit 1mdb hilang langsung taknk cari.. sebaliknya Habis pelaburan dulu dijual dek nak bayar hutang 1mdb.<br /><br />Apa lagi nk dijual lepasni entahlah..<br /><br />Tak boleh terima transaksi peniagaan model mcm ni. 100% Hancing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-65099928345922969752016-07-20T17:38:00.151+08:002016-07-20T17:38:00.151+08:00Hai gigil lutut nak eja mentaru. Ha ha musim sejuk...Hai gigil lutut nak eja mentaru. Ha ha musim sejuk!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-76268712100629761812016-07-20T17:30:12.269+08:002016-07-20T17:30:12.269+08:00"1MDB funds had also been used by Riza (Najib..."1MDB funds had also been used by Riza (Najib's stepson) to purchase two properties in New York and Los Angeles, allegedly belonging to Penang-born tycoon Low Taek Jho, who is most often referred to as Jho Low."<br /><br />Previously when the media attacked Najib and Rosmah asking how come Riza suddenly became very rich, PM's Office (PMO) put out a media statement saying there was a "legacy of wealth".<br /><br />But ALL Najib's siblings signed a media statement denying their father was rich, thereby slapping Najib hard on the face.<br /><br />The belief Malaysian public has is that the money came from 1MDB.<br /><br />But the masses have not been aware of these in detail. They must be made aware and these news must be spread far and wide in the country. What WSJ reported is not in the Malaysian Official Secrets Act and therefore can be disseminated.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-74071124913105861722016-07-20T17:19:51.363+08:002016-07-20T17:19:51.363+08:00I like the WSJ statement "investigators in tw...I like the WSJ statement "investigators in two countries believe US$155 million from the Malaysian state fund 1MDB, ended up in Red Granite Pictures (belonging to Najib's stepson) in 2012 through a circuitous route involving offshore companies."<br /><br />Tun Dr Mahathir has also used the words "(payments via) circuitous route involving offshore companies." <br /><br />The extent of nasty plans etched out maybe by Jho Taek Lo. Note the 2nd name - Taek.<br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-81864774595795984622016-07-20T17:14:21.355+08:002016-07-20T17:14:21.355+08:00PiM pencen boleh naik jet, takkanlah lain orang ta...PiM pencen boleh naik jet, takkanlah lain orang tak boleh. Bila Mesha dah kaya dengan kroni, semua boleh naik jet. 2020 tak lama pun.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-47134786307366739152016-07-20T17:12:22.840+08:002016-07-20T17:12:22.840+08:00Txs 2:55 PTG for the very interesting and importa...Txs 2:55 PTG for the very interesting and important news that the United States Justice Department is expected to act to seize assets linked to 1MDB in the largest asset seizure in US history, according to The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) today.<br /><br />Must have that repeated here, there and everywhere. So that the rakyat and the voters become fully aware what Najib has done/ allowed be done.<br /><br />Hope the seizure takes place soon and more news come out.<br /><br />Please inform us as here and elsewhere as when you come across those and related news. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-31158353756876570762016-07-20T17:09:49.156+08:002016-07-20T17:09:49.156+08:00memanglah ko sanggup bayar caj letrik mahai sebab ...memanglah ko sanggup bayar caj letrik mahai sebab kroni tu bapaq kiri kamu. cuba kalau kroni tu bapaq kanan yang tidur sebelah omaq kor, tentu ko tak nak kan kan? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-38243951451549803932016-07-20T17:06:28.586+08:002016-07-20T17:06:28.586+08:00Dia tak tahu dan tak kata berapa "assets belo...Dia tak tahu dan tak kata berapa "assets belongs to the middle eastern regimes" tuh. Tak sebut bila pun.<br /><br />Bahasa Inggeris nya pun berterabur. <br /><br />Jadi, apa dia kata ha nya bohong, tipu, fitnah semata mata.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-83506003747518062892016-07-20T17:04:56.551+08:002016-07-20T17:04:56.551+08:00ko ni buang tebiat atau berilusi sampai ko nampak ...ko ni buang tebiat atau berilusi sampai ko nampak pangkah kat dahi orang walhal hanya ko sorang yang nampak. baru kuar tampoi atau TR?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-67141406041259189242016-07-20T17:02:40.524+08:002016-07-20T17:02:40.524+08:00Protun tu makan orang ker atau jembalang sampai bo...Protun tu makan orang ker atau jembalang sampai boleh menakutkan orang, kik kik kikAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5804517524914126265.post-5124755790281065782016-07-20T17:02:15.048+08:002016-07-20T17:02:15.048+08:00Tiap komen Jing Jibo mesti bodoh bangang.
Dia tak...Tiap komen Jing Jibo mesti bodoh bangang.<br /><br />Dia tak tahu pun berapa besar assets linked to 1MDB tu pun. Tapi nak disoute perkataan yang WSJ gunakan. <br /><br />Damn stupid bloke. Endless stupidity and ignorance.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com